(Credit: Said Khatib/AFP)

The recent surge of violence in Israel and Gaza, initiated by Hamas—a Palestinian militant group, has stirred global outrage. Hamas, which has controlled the Gaza Strip since 2007, is often at odds with Israel due to a complex history of territorial disputes and ideological differences. This current war is a reflection of the longstanding geopolitical tensions in the region that have periodically erupted into open conflict over the past several decades. It’s disheartening to witness the unsettling images of children from both Israel and Gaza caught in the turmoil. As a father of two little toddlers, the idea of my own children facing such inhuman treatment is unbearable, and no child should ever have to live under such war-torn conditions. This imagery transcends the political discourse, compelling me to call on our better angels to protect the children at all costs.

I am writing this article to reflect and offer my two cents on the ongoing crisis. Although I understand the polarized nature of this issue and recognize that staying silent might cause less stir, the imagery of suffering children propels me to voice my thoughts. The situation now calls for a collective global responsibility – a duty to unite in efforts to restore peace and ensure safety for the communities living under a shroud of fear and uncertainty. My heart reaches out to the Jewish community and the families whose lives have been upturned due to the kidnappings orchestrated by Hamas. As I reflect on the tensions between Israel and Gaza, I see a narrative that goes beyond a regional conflict, resonating with a universal ethos of humanity and the shared aspiration for peaceful coexistence. Amidst the ongoing turmoil, the light of hope and peace must continue to shine, urging a call for global solidarity that resonates with a profound sense of urgency. 

Transitioning to a broader historical context, let’s explore the role of the U.S. on the global stage.

U.S. Historical Leadership

The United States has often stepped in to help bring peace to troubled areas around the world. A retrospective glance at U.S. interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan unveils a trajectory aimed at neutralizing threats and reinstating stability within these regions. However, these actions also showed how hard it can be to step into countries with different cultures and political issues. The outcomes underscored the imperative of clear objectives, a profound understanding of the local context, and robust planning.

Besides, the U.S. hasn’t always stepped in just to help; sometimes, it was to protect its own interests, making international relations more complex.

As we transition into a more multi-polar world, the colossal hegemony once held by the U.S. in the early 21st century has seen a shift. Many nations, particularly in the Global South, harbor a mistrust towards the U.S. due to its past decisions in intervention. This evolving global dynamic accentuates the necessity for a more nuanced and collaborative approach in international engagements.

The past actions of the U.S. provide important lessons as we look at new challenges, like those in the Middle East. The experiences from Iraq and Afghanistan serve as useful guides, reminding us to act wisely and think about the long-term effects of our actions. They encourage a careful approach, considering how today’s actions can affect the world in the future. 

As we pivot from a historical lens to the current geopolitical landscape, let’s examine the myriad challenges that the world, particularly the U.S., confronts today.

Current Geopolitical Challenges

The world today faces a variety of challenges, and the United States, with its significant global influence, is often in the center of these issues. One such challenge is the ongoing support the U.S. is providing to Ukraine, a country currently facing aggression from Russia due to longstanding political tensions and territorial disputes dating back to Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014. This situation demands a careful and strong stance to ensure peace and stability in the region.

Moreover, the Middle East is another region where tensions have been high for decades. The situation between Israel and Gaza is one aspect, but the potential involvement of groups like Hezbollah and countries like Iran in the current war in the Middle East could further complicate matters. These additional factors could escalate the situation, making it even more challenging to find a peaceful resolution. It’s imperative to note that engaging the US in another war in the Middle East is not a favorable option; the toll from previous conflicts has been significant both in human and economic terms. The U.S. should exercise caution and prioritize diplomatic and collaborative solutions to avoid being embroiled in further military conflicts in the region.

Given these multifaceted challenges abroad, it’s pivotal to also reflect on domestic matters. The U.S. grapples not only with international dilemmas but also with its own set of domestic and internal political challenges. The division between political parties and the struggle to find common ground on many issues highlight the need for a balanced approach to foreign policy. It’s essential to have a well-thought-out strategy that considers both domestic and international concerns to navigate these complex scenarios effectively.

The interplay of these various challenges, both at home and abroad, emphasizes the necessity for a careful, well-planned approach in U.S. foreign policy. Addressing these issues thoughtfully will be crucial in maintaining peace and stability both domestically and on the global stage.

China’s Ambitions in Taiwan

In the global arena, actions in one region can significantly impact situations elsewhere. This interconnection brings our attention to the Far East, particularly the tension between China and Taiwan. China has long had territorial claims over Taiwan, and the situation remains tense. Now, let’s consider a hypothetical scenario where the U.S. is deeply involved in issues in the Middle East and Eastern Europe, such as the ongoing tensions in Israel-Gaza and Ukraine-Russia.

In this scenario, the U.S.’s attention and resources might be spread thin, possibly creating an opportunity for China to advance its ambitions in Taiwan. If the U.S. is preoccupied elsewhere, it might not be able to respond quickly or effectively to a sudden escalation in the Taiwan Strait. China might see this as a chance to act on its claims over Taiwan, knowing that the U.S. and its allies might be slower to react due to their commitments in other regions.

This hypothetical situation showcases the delicate balance of global politics. It highlights the importance of being vigilant and prepared across multiple fronts. The scenario also emphasizes the need for the U.S. to have a balanced and well-thought-out approach in its foreign policy. It’s crucial to ensure that engagement in one area does not lead to vulnerabilities in another.

The potential for a domino effect, where actions in one region trigger events in another, is a reality in global geopolitics. Therefore, maintaining a balanced focus and being ready to respond to developments in different parts of the world is essential for promoting peace and stability globally.

U.S. Resource Allocation

Navigating the delicate balance between addressing international concerns and tending to domestic issues is a monumental task, particularly when it comes to the allocation of resources. Resources, in this regard, encompass financial assets, manpower, time, and the focused attention of the government. The U.S. engagement in global conflicts or its support for overseas endeavors demands a significant allocation of these resources. While the importance of international engagements is undeniable, the strain on resources could potentially divert attention and assets from pressing domestic issues.

Among the domestic challenges is the entrenched political divide between Republicans and Democrats, currently exemplified by the difficulty in electing a Speaker of the House—a reflection of the broader partisan discord. Such internal political hurdles further strain the already stretched resources as more time and attention are required to navigate through the tumultuous domestic political landscape.

For instance, if a sizable portion of the budget or manpower is directed towards international issues, there might be fewer resources available for domestic priorities such as infrastructure development, healthcare, or education. Every issue, whether domestic or international, is significant and necessitates adequate resources for effective resolution.

Moreover, the manner in which resources are allocated can significantly impact the U.S.’s image on the global stage. A stable presence in international arenas signals strength and reliability, which are crucial for global relations and diplomacy. However, neglecting domestic issues could lead to internal challenges, which might, in turn, weaken the country’s global position.

Furthermore, it’s important to acknowledge a growing weariness among the American public towards protracted and costly wars. While immediate outrage and the desire to counteract terrorism are palpable, the questions of post-war governance and peace maintenance loom large. What plans are in place to govern and maintain peace post-conflict? These are the hard-hitting questions that demand attention. The American public is wary of engaging in another war in the Middle East that could span decades, underscoring the importance of foresight and meticulous planning in resource allocation.

As we pivot our attention back to the Middle East, let’s continue the discussion on the moral dimensions surrounding Israel’s right to self-defense amid the ongoing conflicts.

The Israeli Right to Self-Defense

It’s fundamental to acknowledge that every country, including Israel, has the right to defend itself when faced with threats. However, the situation becomes complex when we consider the humanitarian cost associated with exercising this right, especially in the ongoing conflict with Gaza.

In defending its land and citizens, actions taken can result in loss of life, injuries, and devastation, affecting both sides of the conflict. The humanitarian cost includes not just the loss of innocent lives, but also the long-term suffering caused by destruction and fear. Families are torn apart, and communities are left in ruins, which paints a bleak picture for the future.

This scenario highlights a moral dilemma: the balance between a country’s right to self-defense and the need to minimize human suffering. It is a delicate and challenging balance to maintain, especially in a region where tensions have run high for a long time.

Addressing this issue requires a thoughtful approach that considers not only the immediate security concerns but also the long-term goal of achieving peace and stability. It calls for measures that protect lives, uphold human rights, and foster a conducive environment for peace.

The conversation around Israel’s right to self-defense intertwined with the humanitarian cost should promote dialogue and actions that aim for a peaceful resolution. As we broach the broader humanitarian aspects of these geopolitical tensions, let’s explore the moral obligations that invoke a call to humanity.

A Call to Humanity

In the midst of geopolitical tensions, it’s easy to overlook the human aspect of conflicts. Yet, at the core of these issues are innocent lives that get entangled in the crossfire, particularly children who are the most vulnerable. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza is no exception, and it raises serious concerns for the well-being and future of the young generation growing up amidst violence and fear.

This situation calls upon our shared sense of humanity. It urges us to look beyond political and territorial disputes, and focus on the innocent lives that are being affected. Every child deserves a safe and secure environment to grow, learn, and dream. Yet, the reality for many in conflict zones is far from this ideal.

We hold a moral obligation to strive for peace, not just for the immediate resolution of current conflicts, but for the sake of future generations. A peaceful resolution will provide children and communities a chance to rebuild, to heal from the traumas of war, and to foster a future that holds promise and hope.

The quest for peace also resonates with our collective aspiration for a better world. It’s a call to action for every individual, community, and nation to work together towards creating a more harmonious global environment. In doing so, we not only address the immediate concerns but also invest in a peaceful legacy for the children of today and the leaders of tomorrow.


To encapsulate my reflection, the ongoing tensions between Israel and Gaza not only spotlight the complex geopolitical dynamics at play but also underscore the imperative of cautious, diplomatic efforts in navigating these turbulent waters. This conflict isn’t isolated but part of a larger global narrative, illustrating how interconnected our world is. A thoughtful approach to foreign policy mirrors the U.S.’s responsibility as a global leader, where every action abroad influences lives and shapes international relations. Diplomacy is crucial in navigating these relations, creating a route to tackle global challenges. While the U.S. should unequivocally support its ally, Israel, it should also firmly advocate for reducing human suffering, protecting lives, aiding in halting the conflict, and supporting long-term peaceful resolutions between Israel and Palestine. This aligns with a shared goal towards a peaceful global environment, emphasizing the values of diplomacy and humanity to ensure a hopeful, secure future for all. Such an approach can deter a larger regional conflict in the Middle East, re-establish U.S. leadership in the Global South, and on the global stage.

Written by Steeve Simbert, former Congressional Staffer, former Consultant at the Department of the Navy, and IT Portfolio Management Consultant at the Department of State.

Disclaimer: The perspectives and opinions expressed in this article are solely my own and do not represent or reflect the views of my employer or any of the institutions I have been associated with in the past. This piece is written in a personal capacity and is intended to contribute to the discussion on the ongoing situation in Israel and Gaza, urging for peace and stability in the region. While I have aimed to provide a thoughtful reflection on the matter, I acknowledge that the situation is complex and the narrative herein is by no means exhaustive or definitive.

Similar Posts